
Using natural
consequences is a very effective tool to reinforce new behaviors in
others.
Ever taken a one day
course? How much of it do you absorb and apply? Experts say a
person is fortunate to retain 10% of the course content. That's a
90% waste factor. Unacceptably low in any other business, except in
training. Why is it so low?
Traditional training
doesn't align with how human beings learn. We can't absorb that
much in one shot. People learn one step at a time by making
repetitive errors. For example, last fall I installed a new light by
the door of our walkout basement. When I forgot to turn off this
light, it shined annoyingly into our bedroom window. Over the
next two months, I failed at this eight times before I consistently
acquired the new habit of turning off the switch every time I came in that
way.
The key to success is
how you reinforce the change you want. The light shining in our
bedroom window consistently reminded me of my failure. Of course, I
can get mad at the light, but what good does that do? I can get mad
at myself, for being such a dummy. But what good does that do? Each time, I had to accept that if I
didn't want a light beaming through the blinds onto my bed, I had to get up and turn off the light.
Slowly, I willingly burned the new habit into my brain!
Natural
consequences is training on "auto-pilot."
It takes creative thinking and you have to personally be committed
to it as a tool. Think
about what you want someone to do: Meet a deadline. Do what
they say they'd do. Take more initiative. Be helpful to
co-workers. A natural consequence will motivate them to change,
freely and willingly. They might get mad but deep down, they know
you're not doing it to them. They're doing it to themselves.
What you are doing, is no longer rescuing them from their own
current bad habit.
If a person
procrastinates, what is the natural consequence? First of all,
you don't do it for them. The task must remain waiting for them to
complete. If their task affects the rest of a bigger project, that
project either gets delayed in total (with everyone aware of why), or you
take that task away from them (if they are capable but obviously unwilling
to do the job as required). If you can't stomach either of these
leadership choices, you won't be able to use this leadership tool.
That too is a natural consequence for you - you'll be leading but no one
is following! This is the main reason leaders hire a coach - to help
them overcome why they can't make these kind of tough choices.
Many leaders want
the "easy way" so they use punitive consequences. They get
upset, give 'em a lecture, write up the misbehavior to put in a "file"
(very threatening), and other traditional leadership techniques that are
fear-based. They forget that learning new habits takes
self-motivated repetition.
Instead, they create an ego-battle where they might get a person to
do what they want, but they have to constantly pressure them and they lose
the employee's heart along the way. Staff become compliant,
apathetic, resentful and either quit or find ways to get even, such as
undermining the boss.
The key to success is to
notice what's important now in the way you respond to behavior you
want to influence.
Good luck and have a great weekend,
John Kuypers
|